Our brand-new Deepseek-based AI states "Chiefs vs Eagles? ... How Predictable"

Super Bowl predictions from our new Deepseek-based AI trained to be better at forecasting

Share this post

No one can anticipate the future but at Lightning Rod Labs we are training AI to give it its finest shot. With up to date news and a small however feisty 14 Billion specification design, our AI is boldly anticipating the unforeseeable. Join us as we attempt to address humanity's hardest concerns.

Super Bowl Sunday is almost upon us and, simply as two years earlier, we have the Chiefs against the Eagles. The spread currently sits at Chiefs -1.5 with an over-under of 48.5. While the stats are well studied, there remain numerous pressing questions that are less simple to select. Our business, Lightning arrester Labs, has been mining questions from locations like polymarket.com and training a big language model to be much better at forecasting the future (and have seen some intriguing enhancements - term paper inbound). Today we turned its cold, determining eye at the Super Bowl to see if it can provide us some insight into the finer points of what we can expect this Sunday.

For more updates from the AI world register for my newsletter!

Background

Our AI is a 14 billion specification model which is in fact on the smaller sized side. (Some estimates suggest ChatGPT has 1.8 TRILLION criteria and trained utilizing 8000 H100 GPUs. We used 8.) Additionally, its understanding cutoff is from numerous months back so we have built an "agentic pipeline" to do news retrieval, summarization, and ranking. With each concern we offer the news and watch as the AI reasons its method through unknown area to make its best prediction possible.

And Now ... The Important Questions

We positioned the following questions to our AI and assessed its reaction. While we have seen forecast enhancements from our training, use these quotes for prop betting at your own peril.

Will Travis Kelce propose to Taylor Swift after the Super Bowl?

AI Final Prediction: 5% chance

Therefore it seems this Sunday will not be a romantic one. Our AI thinks Taylor and Travis' relationship is rock strong, but a little too personal for a post-Super Bowl proposition. Plus got ta consider if the Chiefs lose. That would be an uncomfortable proposition ...

First, I'll take a look at the bottom lines from the short articles. Travis has remained in a relationship with Taylor because 2023. He's a big football star, and she's been helpful of his career, attending his video games. They seem to have a strong, public relationship, and Taylor has even invited her friends and family to the Super Bowl, showing her commitment.

Some fans are excited, while others, specifically Swifties, are a bit uncertain, specifically offered comments Travis made about Donald Trump going to the Super Bowl. That has triggered some Swifties to question how ideal Travis is for Taylor. However, the couple appears to be keeping their relationship private and not resolving the speculation straight.

I believe the bottom lines are the speculation and his incredibly elusive responses. While he's plainly in a relationship and the Super Bowl is an important occasion, the odds and his actions recommend it's more of a possibility rather than a certainty. I 'd approximate a low possibility, perhaps around 5%, considering all factors.

Will the Eagles do more than 5 "tush-pushes" during the extremely bowl?

AI Final Prediction: 79% possibility

No Jason Kelce hasn't stopped the Eagles from using their signature "tush-push" relocation, now its just a various front-tush being pushed. Will an AI understand what a "tush-push" is? Does an AI even understand what a "tush" is? Will it consider that the Chiefs stopped (debate aside) Josh Allen's comparable efforts? Appears like our AI believes they'll be utilizing Jalen Hurts 600-pound squat and strong legs and lower body (Does our AI have a crush on Jalen Hurts?) time and again throughout this game.

Alright, I'm trying to figure out the probability that the Eagles will do more than 5 "tush-pushes" throughout the Super Bowl. First, I require to understand what exactly a "tush-push" is. From the posts, it looks like it's a technique where the quarterback, in this case Jalen Hurts, uses his legs and lower body strength to press off protectors. It's compared to pushing a heavy box, so it's a physical maneuver that needs strength and technique.

Article 3 dives into the physics of the "tush-push." It explains how Hurts utilizes his leg strength, having done a 600-pound squat, to execute the relocation. The post mentions that the Eagles have a 90% success rate with this strategy, which is quite high. ... I also require to consider the protective techniques of the Chiefs. If the Chiefs know the Eagles' "tush-push" strategy, they might adjust their defense accordingly, which could either increase or reduce the number of times the Eagles use it.

Considering that more than 5 appears like a significant number however possible offered their confidence, I would approximate a probability around 60-70% opportunity. This accounts for their preparation, self-confidence in the method, and the probability that they'll utilize it a number of times, particularly if it works early on.

Will Kendrick Lamar diss Donald Trump throughout the halftime program efficiency?

AI Final Prediction: 65% chance

While our AI might not be like us when it pertains to consciousness, a soul, or any physical symptom, it certainly has viewpoints on Kendrick Lamar. It was pretty uncertain, waffling back and forth, but in the end it believes Kendrick isn't going to back down from a fight.

From the articles, I see that Kendrick Lamar has a history of slamming Trump. He's done this in his songs, like "The Heart Part 4," and even made a statement during a previous halftime program when Trump was present in 2018. That appears significant since it reveals he's done it before, so possibly he'll do it again. But wait, looking at more current posts, it points out that Lamar is moving far from political declarations and focusing more on personal expression. That might indicate he's less most likely to address Trump this time.

However, he's also associated with a fight with Drake, which might provide him reasons to make some public statements, even if they're not political. Another point is the legal concerns surrounding his track "Not Like Us." There's a character assassination suit from Drake, so maybe he's careful about including any questionable tunes in the efficiency. But given that he won the Grammys for that track, he might still want to perform it, even if it's uncertain.

Considering Trump is attending this Super Bowl, which is a high-profile event, Lamar may feel obliged to make a declaration. However, the NFL tends to avoid political declarations during the halftime show, so there's a risk that such material might be restricted or softened.

On the other hand, Lamar has a performance history of making strong proceed huge stages. He's the very first solo rap act to headline the halftime show, which may give him more imaginative flexibility. Plus, his past habits recommends he's not shy about expressing his viewpoints, even in public performances.

But I likewise keep in mind reading that Lamar revealed fatigue about criticizing Trump, comparing it to beating a dead horse. That might indicate he's less encouraged to raise Trump this time around, specifically if he's focusing on his fight with Drake. In summary, weighing all factors-past habits, existing shifts in focus, legal problems, and the occasion's context-the likelihood seems to be moderately high, maybe around 65%.

Will Andy Reid consume a cheeseburger on screen after the super bowl?

AI Final Prediction: 25% possibility

Lets be truthful, Andy Reid enjoys cheeseburgers. And who does not? Will the truth that our AI has never ever tasted the juicy deliciousness of a fresh burger taint its prediction? Appears like theres somewhat of an opportunity that if the chiefs taste victory, Andy will taste Angus Beef.

From the posts, I see that Terry Bradshaw made a joke about Andy Reid eating a cheeseburger throughout a Super Bowl event. Bradshaw later on said sorry for the joke, stating he didn't imply to trigger offense and that he actually discovered it humorous himself. Reid seemed to take it in stride, which might show he's the type to laugh it off instead of getting upset.

Taking a look at the posts, it discusses that Andy Reid is a food lover and loves cheeseburgers. There's a short article specifically about his love for food, which suggests that he's a person who enjoys consuming, particularly with his group. So, if there were plans to celebrate after the Super Bowl, it's possible he would partake in a cheeseburger, especially if the scenario is on screen for a celebration.

Will the opening coin toss in the Super Bowl be tails?

AI Final Prediction: 50% possibility

"Tails never fails?" You can't deceive the machines !! Betters leading up to the superbowl have actually been anticipating the coin toss and 53% are forecasting heads due to it being heads 3 of the last 4 extremely bowls. Potentially profitable? Maybe. Statistically incongruent? Certainly. Luckily our AI can't be deceived and thinks anything can occur when that coin enters the air.

Okay, so I'm trying to figure out the likelihood that the opening coin toss in the Super Bowl will be tails. I understand that a coin toss is supposed to be 50/50, but there's some historic data that may influence this forecast.

First, I check out the posts supplied. They all discuss the historical statistics of Super Bowl coin tosses. It appears like tails has actually shown up more typically than heads traditionally. Specifically, in 58 Super Bowls, tails has been the outcome 30 times, which has to do with 52%, while heads has actually been 28 times, which has to do with 48%. So, based purely on history, tails has a small edge, but it's not a big difference.

However, I keep in mind that the outcome of a coin toss is usually thought about random. The minor historical edge for tails could be due to chance. But when making predictions, in some cases people weigh historic data even if it's not statistically substantial. So, I must think about whether this historic predisposition needs to influence the possibility.

After considering it, I choose that while the historical information reveals a small preference for wolvesbaneuo.com tails, it's not statistically substantial enough to move the probability away from 0.5. So, I'll go with 0.5 as the probability, acknowledging that the minor historic edge exists however does not override the reality that each toss is an independent 50/50 occasion.

Will the referees cheat to help the Chiefs win the Super Bowl?

AI Final Prediction: 1% possibility

We get it, you think the refs like and are gon na assist him win. If I wasn't born and raised in Kansas City (I guarantee we didn't inject pro-Kansas City training data) I would probably think the same. BUT, its authorities now due to the fact that our AI states the possibilities are only 1% (hmmmm ... 1% is still type of high when it pertains to scams on a nationwide scale). Appears like the Chiefs will have to win fair and square!

AI Reasoning:

Okay, so I'm attempting to find out the possibility that the referees will cheat to help the Chiefs win the Super Bowl. Hmm, that's a quite severe allegation. Let me break this down. First, I'm seeing a great deal of posts that speak about conspiracy theories recommending referees are prejudiced towards the Chiefs. People are pointing to some doubtful employ recent games, particularly the AFC National championship. That does seem to trigger some uncertainty. I can see why fans may get annoyed when their group loses due to what they perceive as bad officiating.

But then I check out that the NFL Referees Association and the Commissioner, Roger Goodell, have both dismissed these claims as "outrageous" and "outrageous." They say there's no proof of organized bias. That's a strong statement from the people in charge. If they're rejecting it, it may mean there's no real basis or they would have resolved it in a different way if there was some reality to it.

Looking at the short articles, a number of sources like [1], [5], [6], [7], [8], and [9] all report that the officials are against these claims, and some even called them insulting. They likewise discussed that analytical analysis doesn't reveal any pattern of favoritism towards the Chiefs. For circumstances, Mike Pereira from FOX said data reveals the Chiefs have been punished more considering that 2022. That's interesting due to the fact that if they were getting special treatment, you might anticipate less charges, right?

...

So, putting it all together, the possibility that referees will cheat to assist the Chiefs win the Super Bowl is most likely very low. Maybe not zero due to the fact that you can't rule out every possibility, however extremely not likely.

Summary

There you have it everyone, is it even worth viewing the video game still? I guess I'll need to wait and see how the game turns out before we unleash this upon the stock market. Fingers crossed for a good video game! And hello, if it turns out our AI was wrong about whatever, a minimum of it can gain from this.